Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 6, September 2010
Article Number 604
Number of page(s) 7
Published online 08 July 2010
  • Akaike H., 1973. Information theory and extension of the maximum likelihood principle. In: 2nd International Symposium in Information Theory, Budapest, Hungary, Akademiai Kiado, pp. 267–281. [Google Scholar]
  • Anonymous, 2001. Hyvän metsänhoidon suositukset. Publications of Forestry Development Centre Tapio, Libris Oy, Helsinki, Finland (in Finnish). [Google Scholar]
  • Canham C.D., LePage P.T. and Coates K.D., 2004. A neighborhood analysis of canopy tree competition: effects of shading versus crowding. Can. J. For. Res. 34: 778–787. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Casper B.B. and Jackson R.B., 1997. Plant competition underground. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 28: 545–570. [Google Scholar]
  • Cournède P.H., Mathieu A., Houllier F., Barthélémy D. and de Reffye P., 2008. Computing competition for light in the GREENLAB model of plant growth: a contribution to the study of the effects of density on resource acquisition and architectural development. Ann. Bot. 101: 1207–1219. [Google Scholar]
  • De Luis M., Raventós J., Cortina J., Moro M.J. and Bellot J., 1998. Assessing components of a competition index to predict growth in an even-aged Pinus nigra stand. New For. 15: 223–242. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Frivold L.H. and Frank J., 2002. Growth of mixed birch-coniferous stands in relation to pure coniferous stands at similar sites in south-eastern Norway. Scand. J. For. Res. 17: 139–149. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Goldberg D.E. and Barton A.M., 1992. Patterns and consequences of interspecific competition in natural communities – a review of field experiments with plants. Am. Nat. 139: 771–801. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kalliokoski T., Pennanen T., Nygren P., Sievänen R. and Helmisaari H.-S., 2010. Belowground interspecific competition in mixed boreal forests: fine root and ectomycorrhiza characteristics along stand developmental stage and soil fertility gradients. Plant Soil, 330: 73–89. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kellomäki S., Ikonen V.P., Peltola H. and Kolström T., 1999. Modelling the structural growth of Scots pine with implications for wood quality. Ecol. Model. 122: 117–134. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kelty M.J., 2006. The role of species mixtures in plantation forestry. For. Ecol. Manage. 233: 195–204. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Knoke T., Ammer C., Stimm B. and Mosandl R., 2008. Admixing broadleaved to coniferous tree species: a review on yield, ecological stability and economics. Eur. J. For. Res. 127: 89–101. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Lappi-Seppälä M., 1930. Untersuchungen über die Entwicklung gleichaltriger Mischbestände aus Kiefer und Birke, basiert auf Material der Südhälfte von Suomi (Finland). Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 15: 1–243. [Google Scholar]
  • Lintunen A. and Kaitaniemi P., 2010. Responses of crown architecture in Betula pendula to competition are dependent on the species of neighbouring trees. Trees 24: 411–424. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Littell R.C., Milliken G.A., Stroup W.W., and Wolfinger R.D., 1996. SAS system for mixed models. SAS Institute Cary, NC. [Google Scholar]
  • Meng S.X., Rudnicki M., Lieffers V.J., Reid D.E.B. and Silins U., 2006. Preventing crown collisions increases the crown cover and leaf area of maturing lodgepole pine. J. Ecol. 94: 681–686. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Mielikäinen K., 1980. Structure and development of mixed pine and birch stands. Commun. Inst. For. Fenn. 99: 1–82. [Google Scholar]
  • Nichols J.D., Bristow M. and Vanclay J.K., 2006. Mixed-species plantations: prospects and challenges. For. Ecol. Manage. 233: 383–390. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Niinemets U. and Lukjanova A., 2003. Needle longevity, shoot growth and branching frequency in relation to site fertility and within-canopy light conditions in Pinus sylvestris. Ann. For. Sci. 60: 195–208. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Olano J.M., Laskurain N.A., Escudero A. and De La Cruz M., 2009. Why and where do adult trees die in a young secondary temperate forest? The role of neighbourhood. Ann. For. Sci. 66: 105. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Quail P.H., 2002. Photosensory perception and signalling in plant cells: new paradigms? Curr. Opin. Cell Biol. 14: 180–188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rivas J.J.C., González J.G.Á., Aguirre O. and Hernández F.J., 2005. The effect of competition on individual tree basal area growth in mature stands of Pinus cooperi Blanco in Durango (Mexico). Eur. J. For. Res. 124: 133–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Rouvinen S. and Kuuluvainen T., 1997. Structure and asymmetry of tree crowns in relation to local competition in a natural mature Scots pine forest. Can. J. For. Res. 27: 890–902. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Shorohova E., Kuuluvainen T., Kangur A. and Jõgiste K., 2009. Natural stand structures, disturbance regimes and successional dynamics in the Eurasian boreal forests: a review with special reference to Russian studies. Ann. For. Sci. 66: 201. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Sievänen R., Perttunen J., Nikinmaa E. and Kaitaniemi P., 2008. Toward extension of a single tree functional-structural model of Scots pine to stand level – effect of the canopy of randomly distributed, identical trees on development of tree structure. Funct. Plant Biol. 35: 964–975. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Singer J.D., 1998. Using SAS PROC MIXED to fit multilevel models, hierarchical models, and individual growth models. J. Educ. Behav. Stat. 23: 323–356. [Google Scholar]
  • Sinoquet H. and Rivet P., 1997. Measurement and visualization of the architecture of an adult tree based on a three-dimensional digitising device. Trees 11: 265–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Spilke J., Piepho H.P. and Hu X., 2005. Analysis of unbalanced data by mixed linear models using the MIXED procedure of the SAS system. J. Agron. Crop. Sci. 191: 47–54. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stadt K.J., Huston C., Coates K.D., Feng Z.L., Dale M.R.T. and Lieffers V.J., 2007. Evaluation of competition and light estimation indices for predicting diameter growth in mature boreal mixed forests. Ann. For. Sci. 64: 477–490. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Strand M., Lofvenius M.O., Bergsten U., Lundmark T. and Rosvall O., 2006. Height growth of planted conifer seedlings in relation to solar radiation and position in Scots pine shelterwood. For. Ecol. Manage. 224: 258–265. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Tchebakova N.M., Rehfeldt G.E. and Parfenova E.I., 2003. Redistribution of vegetation zones and populations of Larix sibirica Ledeb. and Pinus sylvestris L. in Central Siberia in a warming climate. Siberian Ecol. J. 10: 677–686. [Google Scholar]
  • Tomé M. and Burkhart B.E., 1989. Distance-dependent competition measures for predicting growth of individual trees. For. Sci. 35: 816–831. [Google Scholar]
  • Valkonen S. and Ruuska J., 2003. Effect of Betula pendula admixture on tree growth and branch diameter in young Pinus sylvestris stands in southern Finland. Scand. J. For. Res. 18: 416–426. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]