Free Access
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 67, Number 8, December 2010
Article Number 803
Number of page(s) 8
Section Original articles
Published online 07 October 2010
  • Bauhus J.,Puettmann K., and Messier C., 2009. Silviculture for old-growth attributes. For. Ecol. Manage. 258: 525–537. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Bigler C. and Bugmann H., 2003. Growth-dependent tree mortality models based on tree rings. Can. J. For. Res. 33: 210–221. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Binkley D.,Stape J.L.,Ryan M.G.,Barnard H.R., and Fownes J., 2002. Age-related decline in forest ecosystem growth: an individual-tree, stand-structure hypothesis. Ecosystems 5: 58–67. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Brang P., 2005. Virgin forests as a knowledge source for central European silviculture: reality or myth? For. Snow Landsc. Res. 79: 19–32. [Google Scholar]
  • Castagneri D., Lingua E., Vacchiano G., Nola P., and Motta R., 2010. Diachronic analysis of individual-tree mortality in a Norway spruce stand in the eastern Italian Alps. Ann. For. Sci. 67: 304. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Castagneri D.,Vacchiano G.,Lingua E., and Motta R., 2008. Analysis of intraspecific competition in two subalpine Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands in Paneveggio (Trento, Italy). For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 651–659. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Cherubini P.,Fontana G.,Rigling D.,Dobbertin M.,Brang P., and Innes J.L., 2002. Tree-life history prior to death: two fungal root pathogens affect tree-ring growth differently. J. Ecol. 90: 839–850. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Dobbertin M., 2005. Tree growth as indicator of tree vitality and of tree reaction to environmental stress: a review. Eur. J. For. Res. 124: 319–333. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Drew J.T. and Flewelling J.W., 1979. Stand density management: an alternative approach and its application to Douglas fir plantations. For. Sci. 25: 518–532. [Google Scholar]
  • Foster D.,Swanson F.,Aber J.,Burke I.,Brokaw N.,Tilman D., and Knapp A., 2003. The importance of land-use legacies to ecology and conservation. BioScience 53: 77–88. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Foster D.R.,Orwig D.A., and McLachlan J.S., 1996. Ecological and conservation insights from reconstructive studies of temperate old-growth forests. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11: 419–424. [NASA ADS] [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [MathSciNet] [PubMed] [Google Scholar]
  • Franklin J.F., Mitchell R.J., and Palik B.A., 2007. Natural disturbance and stand development principles for ecological forestry, Gen. Tech. Rep. NRS-19, USDA, Northern Research Station, Newtown Square, PA, 44 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Hammer Ø.,Harper D.A.T., and Ryan P.D., 2001. PAST: Paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontologia Electronica 4: 1–9. [MathSciNet] [Google Scholar]
  • Holeksa J.,Saniga M.,Szwagrzyk J.,Dziedzic T.,Ferenc S., and Wodka M., 2007. Altitudinal variability of stand structure and regeneration in the subalpine spruce forests of the Pol’ana biosphere reserve, Central Slovakia. Eur. J. For. Res. 126: 303–313. [Google Scholar]
  • Holeksa J.,Zielonka T., and Zywiec M., 2008. Modeling the decay of coarse woody debris in a subalpine Norway spruce forest of the West Carpathians, Poland. Can. J. For. Res. 38: 415–428. [Google Scholar]
  • Holeksa V.J., 2001. Coarse woody debris in a Carpathian subalpine spruce forest. Forstw. Cbl. 120: 256–270. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Keeton W.S., 2006. Managing for late-successional/old-growth characteristics in northern hardwood-conifer forests. For. Ecol. Manage. 235: 129–142. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Kohm K.A. and Franklin J.F., 1997. Creating a forestry for the 21st century: the science of ecosystem management, Island Press, Washington D.C., 475 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Long J.N., 2009. Emulating natural disturbance regimes as a basis for forest management: A North American view. For. Ecol. Manage. 257: 1868–1873. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Long J.N. and Shaw J.D., 2005. A density management diagram for even-aged ponderosa pine stands. West. J. Appl. For. 20: 205–215. [Google Scholar]
  • Marage D. and Lemperiere G., 2005. The management of snags: A comparison in managed and unmanaged ancient forests of the Southern French Alps. Ann. For. Sci. 62: 135–142. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Mencuccini M., Piussi P., and Zanzi Sulli A., 1995. Thirty years of seed production in a subalpine Norway spruce forest: patterns of temporal and spatial variation. For. Ecol. Manage. 76: 109–125. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Motta R., 2002. Old-growth forests and silviculture in the Italian Alps: the case-study of the strict reserve of Paneveggio (TN). Plant Biosyst. 136: 223–232. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Motta R.,Berretti R.,Lingua E., and Piussi P., 2006. Coarse woody debris, forest structure and regeneration in the Valbona Forest Reserve, Paneveggio, Italian Alps. For. Ecol. Manage. 235: 155–163. [Google Scholar]
  • Motta R.,Maunaga Z.,Berretti R.,Castagneri D.,Lingua E., and Meloni F., 2008. La Riserva forestale di Lom (Repubblica di Bosnia Erzegovina): descrizione, caratteristiche, struttura di un popolamento vetusto e confronto con popolamenti stramaturi delle Alpi italiane. Forest@ 5: 100–111. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Motta R.,Morales M., and Nola P., 2006. Human land-use, forest dynamics and tree growth at the treeline in the Western Italian Alps. Ann. For. Sci. 63: 739–747. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Motta R.,Nola P., and Piussi P., 1999. Structure and stand development in three subalpine Norway spruce (Picea abies (L.) Karst.) stands in Paneveggio (Trento, Italy). Glob. Ecol. Biogeogr. 8: 455–473. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Motta R.,Nola P., and Piussi P., 2002. Long-term investigations in a strict forest reserve in the eastern Italian Alps: spatio-temporal origin and development in two multi-layered subalpine stands. J. Ecol. 90: 495–507. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Oliver C.D. and Larson B.C., 1996. Forest stand dynamics. John Wiley & Sons, New York, 520 p. [Google Scholar]
  • Piussi P., 1976. Observations sur l’âge et la croissance en diamètre de certains épicéas de haute montagne. Beih. Z. Schweiz. Fortsvereins, 57: 66–73. [Google Scholar]
  • Reineke L.H., 1933. Perfecting a Stand-Density Index for even-aged forests. J. Agric. Res. 46: 627–638. [Google Scholar]
  • Shaw J.D., 2000. Application of stand density index to irregularly structured stands. West. J. Appl. For. 15: 40–42. [Google Scholar]
  • Smith F.W. and Long J.N., 2001. Age-related decline in forest growth: an emergent property. For. Ecol. Manage. 144: 175–181. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Sollins P., 1982. Input and decay of coarse woody debris in coniferous stands in western Oregon and Washington. Can. J. For. Res. 12: 18–28. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Stokland J.N., 2001. The coarse woody debris profile: an archive of recent forest history and an important biodiversity indicator. Ecol. Bull. 49: 71–83. [Google Scholar]
  • Storaunet K.O. and Rolstad J., 2002. Time since death and fall of Norway spruce logs in old-growth and selectively cut boreal forest. Can. J. For. Res. 32: 1801–1812. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Svoboda M. and Pouska V., 2008. Structure of a Central-European mountain spruce old-growth forest with respect to historical development. For. Ecol. Manage. 255: 2177–2188. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vandekerkhove K., De Keersmaeker L.,Menke N.,Meyer P., and Verschelde P., 2009. When nature takes over from man: Dead wood accumulation in previously managed oak and beech woodlands in North-western and Central Europe. For. Ecol. Manage. 258: 425–435. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Vasiliauskas R., 2001. Damage to trees due to forestry operations and its pathological significance in temperate forests: a literature review. Forestry 74: 319–336. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Woodall C.W. and Nagel L.M., 2006. Coarse woody type: a new method for analyzing coarse woody debris and forest change. For. Ecol. Manage. 227: 115–121. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeide B., 1995. A relationship between size of trees and their number. For. Ecol. Manage. 72: 265–272. [CrossRef] [Google Scholar]
  • Zeng H., Garcia-Gonzalo J., Peltola H., and Kellomäki S., 2010. The effects of forest structure on the risk of wind damage at a landscape level in a boreal forest ecosystem. Ann. For. Sci. 67: 111. [CrossRef] [EDP Sciences] [Google Scholar]
  • Zielonka T., 2006. Quantity and decay stages of coarse woody debris in old-growth subalpine spruce forests of the western Carpathians, Poland. Can. J. For. Res. 36: 2614–2622. [Google Scholar]