EDP Sciences logo
Search
Menu
All issues Volume 63 / No 8 (December 2006) Ann. For. Sci., 63 8 (2006) 823-831 References
Free Access
Issue
Ann. For. Sci.
Volume 63, Number 8, December 2006
Page(s) 823 - 831
DOI https://doi.org/10.1051/forest:2006065
Published online 09 December 2006
References of  Ann. For. Sci. 63 (2006) 823-831
  1. Ådjers G., Hadengganan S., Kuusipalo J., Nuryanto K., Vesa L., Enrichment planting of dipterocarps in logged-over secondary forests: effect of width, direction and maintenance method of planting line on selected Shorea species, For. Ecol. Manage. 73 (1995) 259-270 [CrossRef].
  2. Agestam E., Ekö P.M., Nilsson U., Welander N.T., The effects of shelterwood density and site preparation on natural regeneration of Fagus sylvatica in southern Sweden, For. Ecol. Manage. 176 (2003) 61-73 [CrossRef].
  3. Askins R.A., Sustaining biological diversity in early successional communities: the challenge of managing unpopular habitats, Wild. Soc. Bull. 29 (2001) 407-412.
  4. Aubin I., Beaudet M., Messier C., Light extinction coefficients specific to the understory vegetation of the southern boreal forest, Quebec, Can. J. For. Res. 30 (2000) 168-177 [CrossRef].
  5. Baker D.L., Andelt W.F., Burnham K.P., Shepperd W.D., Effectiveness of Hot Sauce and Deer Away repellents for deterring elk browsing of aspen sprouts, J. Wildl. Manage. 63 (1999) 1327-1336.
  6. Bouchard A., Domon G., The transformations of the natural landscapes of the Haut-Saint-Laurent (Québec) and their implications on future resource management, Landsc. Urb. Plann. 37 (1997) 99-107.
  7. Boulet-Gercourt B., Lebleu G., Les plantations d'enrichissement : leur utilisation après chablis, Forêt-entreprise 135 (2000) 53-59.
  8. Brandeis T.J., Newton M., Cole E.C., Underplanted conifer seedling survival and growth in thinned Douglas-fir stands, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 302-312 [CrossRef].
  9. Brisson J., Bouchard A., In the past two centuries, human activities have caused major changes in the tree species composition of southern Quebec, Canada, Écoscience 10 (2003) 236-246.
  10. Brooks R.T., Abundance, distribution, trends, and ownership patterns of early-successional forests in the northeastern United States, For. Ecol. Manage. 185 (2003) 65-74 [CrossRef].
  11. Buckley D.S., Sharik T.L., Isebrands J.G., Regeneration of northern red oak: positive and negative effects of competitor removal, Ecology 79 (1998) 65-78.
  12. Carnevalea N.J., Montagnini F., Facilitating regeneration of secondary forests with the use of mixed and pure plantations of indigenous tree species, For. Ecol. Manage. 163 (2002) 217-227 [CrossRef].
  13. Cogliastro A., Benjamin K., Bouchard A., Effects of full and partial clearing, with and without herbicide, on weed cover, light availability, and establishment success of white ash on shrub communities of abandoned pastureland in southwestern Quebec, Canada, New For. 32 (2006) 197-210.
  14. Cogliastro A., Gagnon D., Daigle S., Bouchard A., Improving hardwood afforestation success: an analysis of the effects of soil properties in southwestern Quebec, For. Ecol. Manage. 177 (2003) 347-359 [CrossRef].
  15. Curt T., Coll L., Prévosto B., Balandier P., Kunstler G., Plasticity in growth, biomass allocation and root morphology in beech seedlings as induced by irradiance and herbaceous competition, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 51-60 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  16. Domon G., Bouchard A., Gariépy M., The dynamics of the forest landscape of Haut-Saint-Laurent (Quebec, Canada): interactions between biophysical factors, perception and policy, Landsc. Urban Plann. 25 (1993) 53-74.
  17. Drever C.R., Lertzman K.P., Effects of a wide gradient of retained tree structure on understory light in coastal Douglas-fir forests, Can. J. For. Res. 33 (2003) 137-146 [CrossRef].
  18. Gordon A.M., Simpson J.A., Williams P.A., Six-year response of red oak seedlings planted under a shelterwood in central Ontario, Can. J. For. Res. 25 (1995) 603-613.
  19. Grassi G., Giannini R., Influence of light and competition on crown and shoot morphological parameters of Norway spruce and silver fir saplings, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 269-274 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  20. Greene D.F., Kneeshaw D.D., Messier C., Lieffers V., Cormier D., Doucet R., Coates K.D., Groot A., Grover G., Calogeropoulos C., Modelling silvicultural alternatives for conifer regeneration in boreal mixedwood stands (aspen/white spruce/balsam fir), For. Chron. 78 (2002) 281-295.
  21. Hannah P.R., The shelterwood method in northeastern forest types: a litterature review, North. J. Appl. For. 5 (1988) 70-77.
  22. Harrington C.A., Forests planted for ecosystem restoration or conservation, New For. 17 (1999) 175-190.
  23. Hix D.M., McNeel C.A., Townsend E.C., Treatments for enhancing early survival and growth of northern red oak seedlings, Tree Planters' Notes 45 (1994) 137-141.
  24. Hooper E., Condit R., Legendre P., Responses of 20 native tree species to reforestation strategies for abandoned farmland in Panama, Ecol. Appl. 12 (2002) 1626-1641.
  25. Hulbert S.H., Pseudoreplication and the design of ecological field experiments, Ecol. Monogr. 54 (1984) 187-211.
  26. Johnson P.S., Responses of planted northern red oak to three overstory treatments, Can. J. For. Res. 14 (1984) 536-542.
  27. Johnson P.S., Dale C.D., Davidson K.R., Planting northern red oak in the Missouri Ozarks: A prescription, North. J. Appl. For. 3 (1986) 66-68.
  28. Kaelke C.M., Kruger E.L., Reich P.B., Trade-offs in seedling survival, growth, and physiology among hardwood species of contrasting successional status along a light-availability gradient, Can. J. For. Res. 31 (2001) 1602-1616 [CrossRef].
  29. Kenk G., Guehne S., Management of transformation in central Europe, For. Ecol. Manage. 151 (2001) 107-119 [CrossRef].
  30. Kozlowski T.T., Physiological ecology of natural regeneration of harvested and disturbed forest stands: implications for forest management, Can. J. For. Res. 158 (2002) 195-221.
  31. Langvall O., Lofvenius M.O., Effect of shelterwood density on nocturnal near-ground temperature, frost injury risk and budburst date of Norway spruce, For. Ecol. Manage. 168 (2002) 149-161 [CrossRef].
  32. Larrick D.S., Bowersox T.W., Storm G.L., Tzilkowski W.M., Artificial oak regeneration in historic woodlots at Gettysburg national military park, North. J. Appl. For. 20 (2003) 131-136.
  33. Lieffers V.J., Stadt K.J., Growth of understorey Picea glauca, Calamagrostis canadensis, and Epilobium angustifolium in relation to overstory light, Can. J. For. Res. 24 (1994) 1193-1198.
  34. Litvaitis J.A., Shrublands and early-successional forests: critical habitats dependant on disturbance in the northeastern United States, For. Ecol. Manage. 185 (2003) 1-4 [CrossRef].
  35. Lorimer C.G., Chapman J.W., Lambert W.D., Tall understorey vegetation as a factor in the poor development of oak seedlings beneath mature stands, J. Ecol. 82 (1994) 227-237.
  36. Luginbühl Y., Perception paysagère des espaces en déprise et des boisements spontanés des terres agricoles, Ingénieries (numéro hors série : boisements naturels des espaces agricoles en déprise) (1999) 25-29.
  37. Man R., Lieffers V., Effects of shelterwood and site preparation on microclimate and establishment of white spruce seedlings in a boreal mixedwood forest, For. Chron. 75 (1999) 837-844.
  38. Marquis D.A., Black Cherry (Prunus serotina Ehrh.), in: Burns R.M., Honkala B.H. (Eds.), Silvics of North America, Vol. 2, Hardwoods, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC,1990, pp. 594-604.
  39. Martinez-Garza C., Howe H.F., Restoring tropical diversity: Beating the time tax on species loss, J. Appl. Ecol. 40 (2003) 423-429 [CrossRef].
  40. Montagnini F., Eibl B., Grance L., Maiocco D., Nozzi D., Enrichment planting in overexploited subtropical forests of the Paranaense region of Misiones, Argentina, For. Ecol. Manage. 99 (1997) 237-246 [CrossRef].
  41. Morgan R.K., The role of protective understorey in the regeneration system of a heavily browsed woodland, Vegetatio 92 (1991) 119-132.
  42. Paquette A., Bouchard A., Cogliastro A., Survival and growth of under-planted trees: A meta-analysis across four biomes, Ecol. Appl. 16 (2006) 1575-1589 [PubMed].
  43. Parent S., Messier C., A simple and efficient method to estimate microsite light availability under a forest canopy, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 151-154.
  44. Ricard J.-P., Messier C., Delagrange S., Beaudet M., Do understory sapling respond to both light and below-ground competition? a field experiment in a north-eastern American hardwood forest and a literature review, Ann. For. Sci. 60 (2003) 749-756 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  45. Rose R., Rosner L., Eighth-year response of Douglas-fir seedlings to area of weed control and herbaceous versus woody weed control, Ann. For. Sci. 62 (2005) 481-492 [EDP Sciences] [CrossRef].
  46. Sander I.L., Red oak (Quercus rubra L.), in: Burns R.M., Honkala B.H. (Eds.), Silvics of North America, Vol. 2, Hardwoods, USDA Forest Service, Washington, DC, 1990, pp. 727-733.
  47. Simard H., Bouchard A., The precolonial 19th century forest of the Upper St. Lawrence region of Quebec: a record of its exploitation and transformation through notary deeds of wood sales, Can. J. For. Res. 26 (1996) 1670-1676.
  48. Smidt M.F., Puettmann K.J., Overstory and understory competition affect underplanted eastern white pine, For. Ecol. Manage. 105 (1998) 137-150 [CrossRef].
  49. Spetich M.A., Dey D.C., Johnson P.S., Graney D.L., Competitive capacity of Quercus rubra L. planted in Arkansas' Boston Mountains, For. Sci. 48 (2002) 504-517.
  50. Thibault M., Les régions écologiques du Québec méridional, Service de la recherche appliquée, Ministère de l'énergie et des ressources, Québec, 1985.
  51. Truax B., Lambert F., Gagnon D., Herbicide-free plantations of oaks and ashes along a gradient of open to forested mesic environments, For. Ecol. Manage. 137 (2000) 155-169 [CrossRef].